In 1852, the Whigs, for forty years a major political force, had been torn asunder by the Clay and Douglas compromise of 1850, a package of bills which kicked down the road the can of slavery in new territories. In'52, Whigs won only four of 31 states. In '54, disaffected northern Whigs split off to found a new party they named "Republican". In the election of '56, Republican Fremont finished a respectable second out of four, and in '60, the six year old party placed Lincoln in the White House with a solid plurality.
As were those 19thC Whigs, today's Republicans are in zerrissenheit, the state of "torn aparted-ness”, rent between family- value ideologues and fiscal conservatives. And therein lies this opportunity to create a new, potentially powerful political party -- The Common Sense Party.
The Common Sense Party will appeal to and serve the interests of urban, educated people (especially women) and those already in or aspiring to the upper middle class. The party's mission will be to improve America by focusing on solutions to its problems and realization of its new potentialities. The party's values are Civility, Knowledge, and Pragmatism; it will eschew mindless ideology and seek workable consensus.
The party will be formed and energized by moderate Republican dissenters, especially mayors and governors; independents like Michael Bloomberg; and business and financial leaders bolstered by celebrities. It will focus on the Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Washington, Oregon and California.
Over two presidential election cycles, it will secure the White House, enjoy a working swing bloc in the Senate, and be challenging for the plurality of the House.
How are pragmatism and knowledge reflected in its platform? The Common Sense Party intends:
In Foreign Policy
~To progressively reduce foreign arms sales to zero
- Counter balancing with subsidized sale of peaceful development ware, e.g., water treatment plants, hospitals and clinics, schools, irrigation equipment, emission control and scrubber equipment
- Subordinating a focus on elections; freedoms come first
~To progressively seek diplomatic engagement with hostile states
~To increase State Dept. funding to progressively larger % of Defense Dept. funding
In Defense
~To progressively reduce the defense establishment to under 3% of GDP
~To follow Joint Chiefs weapons requests
- Eliminating Congressional weapons overrides of JC
- reducing NATO presence
- reducing overseas troop commitments
- Forcing European Community, NATO, So. Korea and Japan to take on more of their own defense
- Strengthening our response capabilities and reaffirming mutual defense commitments in Europe and Asia, but as second responder rather than first-line presence
~To dismantle the bloated national intelligence bureaucracy
- Removing CIA from offensive, covert military actions, e.g., drone attacks, and focusing on foreign Intel
- Assigning to DOD all military, special forces and covert operations
- Assigning the FBI all domestic Intel
- Renouncing “war on terror” language and treating terrorism as a criminal conspiracy
- Quantifying and reducing the intelligence contractor community
- Dismantling the Dept. of Homeland Security
- Assigning National Security Advisor the task of consolidating CIA, Pentagon and FBI information for Executive Branch digestion
~To reduce entitlement load
- Increasing cap on payroll tax, and apply means test to sustain Social Security net
- Funding Medicaid until incomes rise and the demographic bulge passes, reducing citizens’ reliance
- Continuing to expand medical insurance access
- Supporting home care, home health care, and efforts to reduce hospital admission recidivism
- Relying on market dynamics
- Using food exports as commerce and as foreign policy mechanisms
~To eliminate foreign registered-US based corporate tax advantages
~To end depletion allowance and special income treatments, e.g., carried interest
~To adopt a carbon tax
~To veto tax “bills of attainder”
~To increase infrastructure spending to create entry level and trade employment opportunities
~To study and determine whether value added tax coupled with upper income taxation would fairly generate revenues while simplifying tax collection and filing
~To set a national goal of reducing income inequality to 1960’s levels
- Strengthening the progressive tax system
- Reestablishing upper rates at Reagan-era levels
- Developing an immigration work permit program and pathway to citizenship
- Promulgating the Dream Act
- To achieve balanced federal budgets by 2024
~To enforce EPA responsibility for CO2 emissions
~To develop social and externality cost accounting and incorporate it in industrial and utility permitting processes
~To adopt progressive excise tax on gasoline to balance increased mpg performance
- Using gasoline excise taxes to fund development of mass transit and emission reduction options
In Education
~To fund research and development of programs to reduce male high school dropout rates and prepare and motivate males to enter college
~To fund and reward community college/industry joint ventures to develop needed high-wage skilled labor
~To revoke “no child left behind” and other Federal mandates
- leaving standards, achievement testing, and teacher evaluation to states and localities
In Civil Society
~To reduce prevalence and accessibility of weapons, especially of hand guns
- Promoting that guns make all less safe, not more
- Banning sale and use of high capacity magazines
- Mandating universal background checks on gun purchasers
- Banning public sale of body armor and highly lethal ammunition
- Imposing high excise taxes on ammunition, using funds for gun education programs
- Option: two years in military, with college subsidy after service
- Or one year in neo-CCC or other qualified social services
- Or two years social service after college
- Leaving social regulations entirely to states
- Delegating gun sales control to states and localities so long as consistent with 2nd Amendment
~To reduce incarcerations by funding drug treatment programs and sentencing guidlines
~To increase funding for FDA and USDA inspection and monitoring
In Governance
~To test levels of government funding of elections with a view to equalizing access
- Studying provision of free air time to candidates as a provision of broadcasting license
- while encouraging premium pricing for PACs
~To attack and remove obstacles to voting
~At state level, to work to reduce “safe seat” districting
~To limit campaign donations to constituents only
~To close the 501(c)(4) loophole providing anonymity to PAC contributors
~To prohibit public service unions from political donations to officials of organizations with which they negotiate labor agreements and contracts
~To make unionized public services open shops
My son, Steve, observes that civility is a currency, i.e., a medium of exchange; the more you spend it, he says, the easier and more valuable exchanges become
TC Comments:
ReplyDeleteFletch:
I am too computer-illiterate to use the "comments" space to record my approval of your latest "rumination." I agree with nearly all of your suggestions for the platform of the Common Sense Party. But the Party can't succeed because it can't grow within the current set of institutions.
The twisted policies of this government are shaped by a skewed electoral landscape. Senators and representatives are dependent on huge amounts of campaign money that control their votes. Those who try to think and vote independently can anticipate floods of money going to their opponents in the next election. Those who accept the money stay in office, but sacrifice their independence.
The first goal of the Common Sense Party should be to require that national political campaigns be financed by the public. Time for campaigns should be limited to a few weeks. Television stations should be required to allot blocks of free time for the presentation of conflicting views. Newspapers should be required to charge their lowest rates, with ads limited and paid with public funds.
There are a lot of particulars that would need attention, including some constitutional questions. Primaries and state and local elections are not as critical as campaigns for national office, and could be left along for the time being. To overcome constitutional objections, candidates could use their own funds in campaigns, but other sources should be banned.
The objective of electing people not dependent on campaign money would have huge advantages:
1. If campaigns were financed with public funds, candidates would be less dependent on wealthy pressure groups, and less inclined to promote such things as defense plants in every congressional district, lax regulation of the financial community, tax loopholes that benefit special interests, off-shore tax havens, protection of insurance companies, attorneys and drug manufacturers from predatory activities in the health care field, etc.
2. Most of the measures that would be supported by the Common Sense Party probably would be favored by candidates who had time to think, and would have less incentive to pursue private agendas. One must assume that most of the people in this society, including those who want to run for national office, do not reflect the idiocies of Congress.
Unless basic electoral changes take place, I don't think your suggestions have much chance of succeeding. But if fundamental changes were made, a new party wouldn't be needed.
The U.S. is like a wrestler who has been tied in knots and then asked to walk a tight rope. The first problem is to untie the knots.
I wish the Common Sense Party had a future. In the current sea of mud, I don't think it has a chance. I wish I were wrong!
Tom