Monday, March 26, 2018

A Work in Process

The other day, sharp Shanna Crutchfield from Visions of Equity, a consultancy working with us of Pratt on Racial Equity, described herself as “a work-in-process.”  I am struck by that.  I, too, have been and am a work in process.  I suppose we all are in our own ways, some more radically than others, some at different speeds than others.  In my case, process speeds have come in spurts – especially on matters of social awareness and unearned privilege.

My first, wholly unearned privilege, of course, was pure demographics.  1934, the year I was born, was third lowest year for US births since the WWI.  By the time my high school class of ’52 were applying, colleges and Universities had graduated the tail end of the GI Bill crowd. More labs and dorms had been built for them and faculty hired; schools had capacity to fill and were hungry for those few of us, two-thirds of whom weren’t even seeking admission.  Ten years later, when the baby boomers were applying, including a lot more of the women boomers than in our day, schools could be selective.  I couldn’t then have cracked open the doors to a Hamilton or Harvard.  And business was booming in the late ‘50’s, when we few went into the job market, mainly men of course, companies were scrambling to hire us.  
  
My second, unearned privilege was that Y chromosome.  In 1976, I was put in charge of General Mills’ Marketing Services, a collection of departments that executed the marketing programs of our brand divisions.  Sixty-five percent or more of my 400+ employees were women.  I was 42, well brought up, well-educated and always respectful of women, though I had not worked around many other than secretaries.  Boy, did I have a lot to learn (through sheer confrontation) about unconscious male privilege! Suppositions shattered.  I am proud to have carried over those lessons to Marriott and Westin, and helped move women into positions of responsibility they earned and deserved.  But, I regret to say in hindsight, I should have done more about sexism; we were too lenient on harassers in those days before #MeToo. 

The third unearned privilege?  Race. I am, Ancestor tells me, a stew of Northern European and British genes, that stew that over eons, evolved ‘whites’.  Pratt’s racial equity initiatives, and Shanna’s encouragement, have challenged me anew.  I was raised in an unequal Maryland of segregation and discrimination.  We were aware; I was raised in a family that was intolerant of racism. Our father was intolerant only of intolerance, and he was a fighter. But despite being aware of and opposed to the hardships and injustices delivered on black Americans, it wasn’t until the coin of Discrimination has been flipped over to its other side, White Privilege, that my in-process once again has been sped up.

Examining my white privilege has abruptly confronted my attitudes, certitudes and sensitivities.  It seems, after all, it’s not too late for an old dog to learn new tricks.  The now question is what do I do with this awakening? One of the first changes is to think equity rather than equality.  I’d always focused on equality of access and opportunity. But in the light of privilege, is equality enough? What does equity demand?  Tough questions – personally, professionally, and politically.  What causes deserve support?  What politicians deserve support?  What should my town and community be doing?  Where should my energies and resources be applied? What do I want my grandchildren to believe? What actions are affirmative?

I have few answers so far, but lots of new and unsettling questions.  A work in process, indeed. 

In deed?  TBD.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Reflections on Marching for “Their” Lives: a Lost Opportunity for Seattle


After posting pictures of the Seattle march, of course friends asked what it was like?; what did I think?; what did I feel?  I had been nattering to myself about it in any case; now such questions forced me to articulate the musings that bothered me last night and this morning.

The powerful Washington and New York marches filed moving images and stirring words, they had emotional punch.  Our march, for me at least, offered few if any of those.  Naturally, it was smaller, but moreover, as we moved onto five-lanes-wide 4th Ave, the crowd spaced itself out both in width and length so we lost that tight mass that impresses on-lookers and energizes marchers, that sense of solidarity and impact.  We sort of ambled along.  Efforts to get chants started faded away after a few repetitions.  By 4th Ave, I could move freely through the crowd, chasing signs that intrigued me (especially those most disparaging “the predator in chief.”)

The morning Times and the local TV coverage have made no attempt to gauge the size of the crowd; “several thousand” they said, as if embarrassed by an under-whelming turnout. Crosscut estimated “more than 50,000.” (Crosscut's coverage had the right focus: on the kids. Google it up; this program doesn't allow me to link.)
 
The signs and chants were mainly generic, almost clichés: Never Again; Ban Assault Weapons; Guns Are Not School Supplies; NRA, Go Away.  All worthy, but none Seattle-specific.

But they weren't saying much . ..
When we arrived at Seattle Center, on the “mall” adjacent to Key Arena and the International Fountain, we milled about aimlessly.  On stage was a Shoreline High guitarist; in interludes, Bob Dillon songs from the ‘70’s were being played; a woman student from some school or other sang.  

After half an hour or so, I headed for restrooms in the Armory, which was packed with folks lined up at every food stall looking for lunch.  The stragglers were still arriving.  Eventually, Governor Inslee spoke glowingly about turning the state over to the youngsters, but murkily about gun controls.  Some students spoke, but much of the crowd missed them.  Voter registration was urged. But whatever end-of-march focus and energy the organizers hoped to have had long since been lost.

My estimation: a set of lost opportunities.  The energy and anticipation we felt at Cal Anderson Park (where Attorney General Bob Ferguson had spoken passionately about how Washington State lags others re high capacity magazines and assault rifles) dissipated step by step.  We needed more marshals to keep the mass dense when we reached the wide downtown boulevards.  At the end of march rally, we needed vibrant calls for local, specific actions – action by the City Council (which has discussed constraints on gun purchase and ownership), by the King County Council (which is ambivalent), by the State Legislature (which is hog-tied.)  If there were such calls, most of us never heard them.  The papers and broadcasters never reported them.

True believers will charge me an impatient, hyper-critical, cynical old fart.  And it would be cruelly facile to say the march fizzled.  But, undeniably, opportunities were lost.   

Saturday, March 24, 2018

Today, I Marched for Their Lives: Natalie, Molly, Parker, Max, Ella, Christopher, Liza and a Million Others


From Cal Anderson Park to the Seattle Center --


Mine was an M-1; His was an M-16

Orange is the color of ban
















Yes, she really feels this way.